Imagine a movie climax so intense, so visually shocking, and so utterly bizarre that it leaves you both horrified and exhilarated. That's exactly what happens in the final moments of Weapons, a film that pushes the boundaries of horror and dark comedy. But here's where it gets controversial: the most gruesome scene involves a group of child actors tearing apart the film's villain, Gladys, a centuries-old witch played by the mesmerizing Amy Madigan. Yes, you read that right—kids. And according to writer-director Zach Cregger, they were thrilled to do it. (Spoiler alert: if you haven’t seen Weapons yet, proceed with caution!)
In Weapons, Gladys invades the quiet town of Maybrook, Pennsylvania, and begins hypnotizing its residents, turning them into energy sources to sustain her decaying body. Her methods are as chilling as they are creative: using branches from a mysterious tree and the personal belongings of her victims, she binds their souls to her will. Among her captives are 17 children, who become unwitting pawns in her dark rituals. But the tide turns when Gladys’s “nephew,” Alex (Cary Christopher), discovers how her magic works and uses it against her. In a jaw-dropping twist, the children—once her victims—become her executioners, weaponizing themselves to deliver a finale that’s as disturbing as it is satisfying.
And this is the part most people miss: Cregger revealed in an interview with IndieWire that the child actors were genuinely excited to take down Gladys. He explained the scene to them as a chance to punish the witch who had trapped them, and their response? “YEAAAAH!” Cregger noted, “Kids have not quite developed empathy at that age yet, so there was no questioning it. I was like, ‘Who wants to pull her jaw?’ And they were all fighting for who would do it.” It’s a fascinating—and slightly unsettling—insight into how children perceive violence in a fictional context. But it raises a question: Is it ethical to involve kids in such graphic scenes, even if they’re enthusiastic participants? Let’s discuss that in the comments.
Cregger also shared that working with the young actors, particularly Christopher, required a delicate approach. Unlike the other children, Christopher didn’t read the script, and Cregger isn’t sure if he’s even seen the final film. Instead, they relied on honest conversations to guide his performance. “He’s just such a true actor,” Cregger said. “He asks really intelligent questions. He fully understood everything we were doing, and you can see it in the performance.”
Now, let’s talk about the practical magic—literally. Cregger prioritized practical effects over CGI to bring the film’s chaotic climax to life. The scene where the children hurl themselves through glass windows? Mostly practical, with only minor CGI enhancements for safety. Even the moment when the kids tear down a fence to reach Gladys was a complex composite of multiple shots, blending stunt doubles, child actors, and special effects. “That shot is really fast but deceptively complicated,” Cregger admitted.
The pièce de résistance? Gladys’s gruesome demise. Cregger used a dummy with hoses filled with fake blood, allowing the children to rip it apart while cameras captured the chaos. Lightning-quick edits ensured the audience only glimpsed the most horrifying moments before the full extent of her destruction was revealed. “They were having the time of their little lives,” Cregger said of the child actors. But for him, it was a different story. “The only time I felt not in control of the movie was when the kids were pulling Gladys apart,” he confessed. “It was too much for me, man.”
Despite the challenges, the ending of Weapons is nothing short of masterful—a perfect blend of horror, humor, and sheer audacity. It’s currently streaming on HBO Max, and if you haven’t seen it yet, prepare for a wild ride. But here’s a final thought: Does the film’s reliance on child actors in such violent scenes cross a line, or is it a bold creative choice? Share your thoughts below—this is one debate that’s sure to spark some heated opinions.